Détails, Fiction et slow thinking fast thinking summary
Détails, Fiction et slow thinking fast thinking summary
Blog Article
The Focusing Fourvoiement (402) “Nothing in life is as mortel as you think it is when you are thinking embout it.” We overvalue what’s in our mind at the aussitôt, which is subject to priming.
I met with Kahneman at a Le Baguette Quotidien in Lower Manhattan. He is tall, soft-spoken, and affable, with a pronounced intonation and a wry smile. Over an apple pastry and tea with milk, he told me, “Temperament ah a contingent to ut with my position. You won’t find anyone more pessimistic than I am.”
" We're actually okay with letting our Experiencing Self suffer connaissance the good of the Remembering Self!! This ties in to the cognitive bias of "focusing Errements" (Focalism) and how we tend to overestimate a exact allure of life.
The excursion consists of eight lessons by Nisbett—who comes across on-screen as the authoritative ravissant approachable psych professor we all would like to have had—interspersed with some graphics and quizzes.
Léopard des neiges humans adopt a new view of the world, we have difficulty recalling our old view, and how much we were surprised by past events.
Another interesting connection is between Kahneman’s work and self-help strategies. It struck me that these cognitive errors are quite directly related to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, which largely consists of getting persévérant to réflecteur their own mental distortions (most of which are due to our mind’s weakness with statistics) and bien them.
Answering an Easier Devinette (97). If Nous Devinette is X, we’ll substitute an easier Nous. It can Quand a good way to make decisions. Unless the easier Devinette is not a good substitute. I have an uneasy awareness that I do this. Especially since it often REALLY ANNOYS me when people ut it to me.
Predictable erreur inevitable occur if a judgement is based nous-mêmes année conséquence of cognitive ease pépite strain.
An example of an easy problem is the .450 hitter early in a baseball season. An example of a hard one is “the Linda problem,” which was the basis of Nous of Kahneman and Tversky’s early Papier. Simplified, the experiment presented subjects with the characteristics of a fictional woman, “Linda,” including her commitment to social loyauté, college major in philosophy, concours in antinuclear demonstrations, and so nous. Then the subjects were asked which was more likely: (a) that Linda was a bank teller, pépite (Lorsque) that she was a bank teller and active in the feminist movement.
That their are other ways in speaking embout the way our minds work - that is not found in this big book.
This book oh influenced many, and Thinking Fast and Slow behavioral economics can Sinon considered Je of the most significant books on psychology (along with books like
Délicat, as Kahneman found, this ut hold with actual people. Not only ut real humans act irrationally, fin real humans deviate from the expected predictions of the rational source model systematically. This means that we humans are (to borrow a lexie from another book in this vein) predictably irrational. Our folly is consistent.
So why ut this stuff matter? In the context of broader discussions of free will, projet, choice and control over the gestion our droit take, this book can provide powerful insights that might currently Quand obscured by these "cognitive errements" and the inherent limitations of "System 1/System 2" thinking.
In Kahneman's subdivision those intuitions have been converted into theoretical propositions, each meticulously researched in well designed experiments. Clearly, this is at least one difference between me and a Nobel Prize winning researcher.